Hello Guest

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nskaats

Pages: [1]
1
Firearms / Re: AR10 Scope Recommendations
« on: March 24, 2020, 10:35:25 AM »
I mostly use .308 in this one.  Occasionally burn up some 7.62 with it.  As far as magnification, I'm not interested in being Mr Fudd with a 400x magnification and eight inch lens diameter.  I don't need a telescope for 250 yards.  I prefer the "keep it simple" approach.

2
Firearms / AR10 Scope Recommendations
« on: March 24, 2020, 09:55:22 AM »
Looking for recommendations for a scope for an AR10.  The longest distance I'll most likely be using it is a couple hundred yards.  I don't want to go cheap, but there's really no need for anything super high end at the distance I'll be shooting.  What have you had good and bad experiences with?

3
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: March 13, 2020, 12:59:25 PM »
She makes torque for days!!

4
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: March 04, 2020, 06:42:56 PM »

Nick,

take a look at the air ride suspension fuse if it has one. if it's been deleted and the fuse is still in the block it'll pull when the level sensor engages, thinking it needs to engage the compressor, or lack thereof. When I went through my engine swap on the 04 I chased battery draw for a solid week until I discovered that little gem.

Also, if this had the factory Bose system, that amp is relatively complicated and linked in with the main GPS and other systems than just sound. could just be tied into something that's not keyed power. just my $0.02

Good info to have on the air ride.  I never thought of that.  Of the billions of trucks we've had in here, I can't remember ever having one other than mine with the AutoRide and it's still intact....for now.

5
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: March 04, 2020, 08:36:54 AM »
And I need to make a correction.

I thought the fuel pump thing was done, but apparently not, so I stand corrected.

Battery: It is only maybe two months old if that. Something is draining it, perhaps that new amp or sub woofer I wired in. Not sure if those things stay on or cycle with the ignition switch. The old battery, which was new too, would die in just a few days, and I replaced it, but now the same sort of thing seems to point to some sort of small load constantly draining the battery...

I had the battery on charger all night and it's showing a full charge, but no power anywhere.  I'm leaning toward one of your main fuses or relay up front.

6
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: March 03, 2020, 07:37:22 PM »
She lives!  Truck started up today and heat cycled.  Should be a video on our facebook page shortly.  Battery seems like it's struggling to start it though, so may need to address that one.

Next on the list is getting it onto the other lift to drop the tank and do the fuel pumps and wiring harness.  Intake tube was fabricated today and went across the street to powder coat.  We'll need to find a longer throttle cable and air filter as well.

7
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: February 26, 2020, 03:35:46 PM »
I guess the Friday plan got pushed back.  I have ONE quick connect fuel line fitting that was scheduled for delivery Friday and changed to Monday.  Ain't that how it always goes?  Thanks FedEx!

8
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: February 26, 2020, 12:07:04 PM »
It's getting there.  We tend to start with an order of operations and stick to it.  Things move fairly efficiently that way.  Couple pics from the last two days.  The front portion of the accessory bracket does have to come back off so we can put the updated piece on it.  They moved an idler to a different location that allows for better belt wrap and less chance of slipping.

*Don't worry, the cam gets covered in Lucas assembly lube as it goes in.  The stuff is nasty so we put it on as we go instead of getting it all over

9
Donations / Re: Christmas 2019
« on: December 29, 2019, 06:25:44 PM »
I'm glad to see this worked out well for the kids. I wish I had more opportunity to be involved this year but it's been pretty hectic lately.  This is the first opportunity I've had to even make time to get caught up reading the forum.

These kids really do appreciate anything they get. Any time I've helped out in the past they've always been super excited and grateful.

10
Humor, Good Stuff, and Red Neck Practices! / Re: Just plain funny
« on: December 11, 2019, 08:13:24 AM »
Seems right for ol Joe

11
Build Threads / Re: Let's See Your Other Vehicles
« on: December 09, 2019, 08:38:49 AM »
Still have my 87 El Camino, waiting for the LS/5.3 sitting on the floor in the garage. Kinda on back burner now with everything else. Ol 305 still starts right up with 500k on it.

Has a BGN 3.42 posi. and a full SSBC 4 wheel disc kit, front tube A Arms. Kinda a storage unit for 4x4 parts now.

That's some serious mileage on the old 305.  Those things are hard to kill!

12
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 09, 2019, 04:22:48 AM »
Nick. Not to junk up Dons thread but I have a 2018 denali with the 6.2. What’s the recipe for more hp?

Figure out your goals for the vehicle and a budget you want to work with. Easier to start from there. Could be talking cold sir and a tune or you could be talking big cubic inches and a blower, but it's usually somewhere in between and determined by budget.

13
Powerplant, Driveline, and Braking / Re: LS3 Connect & Cruise
« on: December 08, 2019, 10:20:30 PM »
Progress is still progress. Missing one deal usually leads to another path. It's hard to argue with a nicely packaged SBC.  That 327 could be a perfect cruiser.  Throw a nice EFI system on it and make it a perfectly driveable and reliable cruiser.

14
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 08, 2019, 01:05:52 PM »
I could, BTW, always throw a Texas Speed 408" short block in there later on...

Them's fighting words right there.  If it tells you anything about quality, I have a separate liability waiver for any customer asking me to tune an engine with China Speed parts in it.

You'll also NEVER find a professional engine builder that uses or recommends anything from them.  Lots of reasons for that.

15
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 07, 2019, 05:39:38 PM »
Question  sure you asked, but why port the heads with a blower?

Doesn't really help low end at all and higher up your on boost?

I'd  just get another iron block. Less down time and cheap.

Definitely not a necessary step, but they do appreciate it.  The topic came up as Don mentioned having the heads decked and a fresh valve job.  For the deal I get on CNC machining these heads, it's not that much more to do.

16
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 07, 2019, 05:37:22 PM »
So, I just sent a message to two members who had expressed interest in the 6.0 motor.
I'll wait to see what their response is, then offer it publically.

But on the motor thing, I wanted to score the square port heads. With this 6.2 motor, those heads are already there. the send out to port and fix up, finishes that.

The short block is something I have been thinking about. So, I will be starting with a motor with 100K on the rotating assembly. I am asking myself if that makes sense. From what I have read, some people say that although the rods are better in the gen 4 motor, the pistons may be the weak link.

So that begs the question, should I upgrade the pistons to some forged units??? And if I am tearing down to do that, obviously, I would be replacing the bearings. If I had the motor torn down that far, then cam bearings should be replaced as well, I think

Now if I am going through all that business, why not drop a stroker kit in the bottom end which already has the pistons/rings, bearings, a nice forged crank and super strong rods? But not that I am there, I am adding a bunch of cost to the project and did that tip the scales too far and cause me to just stay with the cleaned up 100K short block???

And to further complicate things, why not just tear down and restroke the 6.0 block? It's iron and stronger than the 6.2 aluminum block...?!?!And if I went this direction, all I'd have to do is to purchase a ready made set of LS3 heads and be done with it.

I am presently stuck in this loop...

Lets discuss the merits of going further in the short block.

I've never had any issues with pistons in them.  Even at 1,000 plus horsepower if tuned properly.

The benefit of the 6.2 is the upgraded internals and it already has the better flowing heads that match the blower without any adapters.  It wouldn't hurt to hit it with some new bearings while it's already on a stand.  If you're replacing any hard parts, I'd do pistons and rods as a set since it'll need to be balanced anyway.  And if you're already going to have to have it machined and balanced for a new set of pistons and rods, might as well buy a stroker kit while you're in there.  These things snowball real quick.  I don't see a need for it unless you're preparing to make some stupid power later on.  If you're going to go that far into it, you are probably better off using what you have and just buying the rectangle port heads.

17
Powerplant, Driveline, and Braking / Re: LS3 Connect & Cruise
« on: December 07, 2019, 12:47:57 PM »
What ever happened with this project?  Super cool truck.  I'd love to see more of it.

For what it's worth we've done plenty with the connect and cruise package.  They're pretty much plug and play powertrain options.  Custom tuning to accomodate for intake and exhaust changes is pretty much the only thing they need.

18
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 07, 2019, 12:32:11 PM »
I think Don pretty well covered our options.  I feel our best bet to make this thing work would be the 6.2 with a cam ground specifically for this application topped with the 1.9 liter LSA supercharger making 10-12 psi of boost.  A complete fuel system upgrade with flex fuel capability to feed it pump gas or E85 depending on what's available would make sense as well.  The rest of the drivetrain and chassis seems like it's ready to handle whatever we throw at it.

I did reach out to Cam Motion as well to get a recommendation on this particular application.  In many of our projects we end up going with a custom designed cam from Brian Tooley or Cam Motion instead of something off the shelf.  These guys are excellent at what they do.  Brian uses Cam Motion or Comp Cams to grind their cams.  Both Comp and Cam Motion have perfected lobe design that allow us to do some really wild projects.  We used one of my personal vehicles to work with BTR to experiment and develop what is now their off-the-shelf spring kit for high RPM use in LS engines.  My engine uses hydraulic roller lifters, off-the-shelf pushrods, and stock rocker arms turning 8,500 RPM for the past two seasons with absolutely no maintenance or problems at all.

19
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 06, 2019, 09:26:52 AM »
Nick. I recommended supercharging a while back so I’m on the same page. However just for curiosities sake is there a mpg difference between the super and a set of small parallels twin turbos?  Sized right, which is no small feat, there is very little lag in the spool. I do agree that there is much more complexity which leads to problems like you mentioned long term with leaks etc.

Just curious about mileage given some parasitic loss.

There really isn't much of any significant parasitic loss on the blowers.  The newer lobe designs are far more efficient in every way compared to the older models.  The internal bypass valve that opens under vacuum helps tremendously so you're not actually compressing anything, which means almost no resistance.  You can turn one of these blowers by hand with no effort at all.  Even with all of the EPA nonsense and fuel mileage requirements the OEM's have been using these instead of turbos, so that should speak volumes.

Turbos are still great, but there is a tremendous amount of misinformation out there about them.  Many still consider them to be "free" horsepower.  They do create some exhaust restriction and have some parasitic loss. On an application where you want them to spool quickly, the smaller turbine housing doesn't help that.  The biggest lie we see all over the internet is how you can throw a turbo system together on a beer budget and make a billion horsepower.  In reality it's quite costly to do it RIGHT, especially if you need reliable and efficient power.

20
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 05, 2019, 09:57:31 AM »
The 1.9 liter blower will support way more than what the Suburban will need.  There's plenty of them making 800 hp or better out there.  If more is needed, we can always step up to one of the new TVS 2650 blowers or a Whipple unit instead.

Turbos are fun and I'm definitely not against them.  However, for a truck application that will be worked it'll be expensive to do it right and reliable.  The hot side has to be carefully designed to prevent any failures due to a wide temperature range with rapid increases at times. You're adding a bunch of potential exhaust leaks and ANY exhaust leaks will hurt performance and cause issues for the PCM operating in closed loop.  Your potential for oil leaks becomes far greater with the added plumbing for turbos.  Oil changes should be more frequent due to the turbos relying on engine oil.  Maintenance in general can become more time consuming with all of the added plumbing.  Lag is also a reality in a turbo application.  On the plus side, turbochargers make great mufflers and will be more efficient in higher RPM.

When it comes to the positive displacement superchargers, whether its the factory LSA blower or a Whipple, they fit truck use better.  Self contained oiling requires almost no maintenance and no extra oil lines.  No clutter to work around in the engine bay.  The entire unit sits on top of the engine so packaging is simple and clean.  No charge piping to leak or pop off.  The only fabrication needed is an intake tube and the only things added to the engine bay are a couple water lines to a pump and remote mounted reservoir.  No exhaust hot side to leak, crack welds, melt plug wires, etc.  Vacuum operated internal bypass valve unlike old blowers, which means no loss of fuel economy and maintains perfect drivability.  Boost is instantaneous when the throttle opens, you don't need a bunch of RPM to use it.  Less heat produced in the engine bay is always a positive.

21
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 04, 2019, 01:20:09 PM »
In case you needed a nudge, Don....these things do work REALLY well and bolt right onto your Suburban.  All that torque is exactly what a truck needs.

22
Build Threads / Re: Let's See Your Other Vehicles
« on: December 04, 2019, 09:10:40 AM »
Appreciate the kind words.  If anyone is interested in following along, there's a complete gallery on my business page for the Daytona here: https://www.facebook.com/pg/skaatsprecision/photos/?tab=album&album_id=1952667521654654

Don, I still consider selling the 5 ton.  It's mostly sat for the past two years.  Running this business plus other endeavors have left little time for it unfortunately.  I really need to clean it up and drive it soon.

Farmer Jon, I LOVE that truck!  I've been itching to get my hands on a post war truck.  Ideally late 40s/early 50s for a shop project.  I have a major weakness for that time period.  Definitely one to keep in the family.  Do a bit of a resto-mod on it and use it as a sunny day driver!

Let's see some more rides!

23
Build Threads / Re: Let's See Your Other Vehicles?
« on: December 03, 2019, 03:46:03 PM »
A few of the Daytona build.  Powertrain is an LS1/T56 combination that will be getting Holley EFI.  Chassis was powder coated in Bronze Chrome with high gloss clear.  All of the suspension is in place, fuel system plumbed, and cockpit aluminum mostly done.  Currently working on engine assembly so it can be bolted in with the trans and I can work on header fabrication.

24
Build Threads / Let's See Your Other Vehicles
« on: December 03, 2019, 03:42:25 PM »
We have lots of truck build threads on here, but I'm curious to see what other project vehicles and toys you guys have.  Most of us enjoy plenty of four wheeled hobbies.

Driver:
01 Yukon XL 2500 2WD with the 8.1 - Dad ordered it new as a tow vehicle.  I bought it from him.  Currently at 237,000 miles

Tow Pig:
2017 Sierra 2500 Denali 4WD with the L5P - Picked it up new in June 2017 as a tow vehicle.

Toys:
2001 Firebird Formula - Street/Strip toy - Had it since April 24th, 2003
1994 Camaro Z28 - Currently apart waiting for me to put the engine in it
1986 AM General M923A1 - Because I can
1965 Shelby Daytona Coupe Replica - Factory Five car being built for SCCA use and to irritate purists

Hauler:
2017 Intech 26' Enclosed Trailer - All aluminum hauler for track days and the occasional pickup/delivery

25
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 03, 2019, 09:33:08 AM »
Boost always makes trucks more fun.  If done right (ie not an ebay build) turbos are great.  I've also been doing a lot of LSA blower conversions.  OEM pieces tend to be far more reliable and the instant full boost of a positive displacement supercharger is perfect for trucks.

26
Build Threads / Re: Topic: 2002 Suburban 2500 build thread, Part 4
« on: December 02, 2019, 01:30:34 PM »
As it turns out I remembered my login information for this forum.  Since starting the business I've had minimal time for forums and such.  It's nice to see this one is still active!  I'm happy to help with the truck anywhere I can, Don.  We have a lot of trucks in and out of here among many other projects.  I haven't had time to get a full website up and running yet but you can follow us on the old bookface at www.facebook.com/skaatsprecision.  I only get a chance to post a portion of the projects we do on there but I do my best to keep things updated regularly.

As far as the tuning side of things, I knew exactly who Don was referring to on his facebook post without him having to mention a name.  I've had to redo a LOT of tunes over the years from that particular business.  They have a loyal following on different forums and facebook groups because they have a good sales pitch, they're cheap, and most of their customer base really doesn't understand much about the process.  People simply don't know what they don't know.  Those in the know always find a local tuner that knows their way around a stock PCM.

In my eyes, mailorder tuning is at best a dishonest business practice.  You just can't do things properly unless you have a chance to drive and datalog the vehicle yourself.  The same thing goes for anyone that locks a PCM.  The people in our industry that do this are typically trying to hide something, often the fact that you didn't get what you paid for.  The only thing they're protecting is reputation.  Intellectual property does not apply in any way to this process.  You're using a third party software/hardware combo to calibrate a computer system that an OEM designed and sold to the end user.  The tuner literally doesn't OWN any bit of it.

27
General Vehicle Related Discussion / Re: Military Vehicles
« on: September 23, 2015, 03:26:33 PM »
I didn't know there was a resizer in Windows.  I just throw them in MS Paint and resize down to 30% of original.

28
General Vehicle Related Discussion / Re: Military Vehicles
« on: September 23, 2015, 03:00:02 PM »
Haha not this time.  These pics were actually taken with my cell phone.  I didn't bother to bring the nicer camera with me.

29
General Vehicle Related Discussion / Re: Military Vehicles
« on: September 23, 2015, 02:51:39 PM »
Resized pics

30
General Vehicle Related Discussion / Re: Military Vehicles
« on: September 23, 2015, 11:37:29 AM »
I tried to upload pics in here.  Submitted the post more than once.  It still hasn't shown up though.

31
General Vehicle Related Discussion / Re: M923 Vs LMTV
« on: September 22, 2015, 10:34:24 AM »
Yes, Nate!  Thank you!  Sorry I've been MIA.  I've been insanely busy lately with work and other projects, plus living a bit of our own personal hell at home for the last month.

Ken, I'll try to get some pics posted over there shortly.

32
General Vehicle Related Discussion / Re: M923 Vs LMTV
« on: September 22, 2015, 10:05:52 AM »
I don't have an experience with the LMTV, but I have an 86 M923A1 that I love.  I picked it up in June and I've put about 600 miles on it to and from the farm and on the trails.  I love the thing!  I've been doing a lot of reading on both the A1 and A2 trucks and I'm happy I ended up with the A1.  The A2s have a little more power and better mileage, but you have to pick what's most important to you.  I'm not using mine to tow 15,000 lbs and it's not exactly a daily driver, so the power of the 14 liter and the mileage are fine for my purposes.  I also appreciate the simplicity of the A1 over the A2.  Turning wrenches all day means I don't really want to have to do it on my pleasure vehicle.  Anything forced induction adds more possible failure points (not to mention more expensive ones) as does the CTIS.  Some may disagree, but I prefer the simplicity.  My 5 ton is for trouble-free fun, if I want to turn wrenches in my free time that's what the race cars are for.

33
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 07, 2015, 02:24:55 PM »
Couple more pics after a bath and the tags on the dash

34
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 07, 2015, 12:09:01 PM »
The entire neighborhood loves it as much as we do. No complaints around here at all. It'll be stored close, but not at home.  I put around 100 miles on it yesterday and everyone that passed was waving. Momma loved it!

To be honest, the wife is the main reason I bought it. Her birthday is in August and I planned to get her a big bore utility ATV for the farm. My cousin mentioned he needed to sell this one to get his new one, and as much as I always wanted one I didn't really consider buying it too seriously. I was at his house last Saturday and he mentioned it so I decided to show her.  The smile on her face closed the deal instantly. This is a true farm girl, she was smiling like a little girl on Christmas morning! While timing wasn't perfect, I know it was right. I haven't gotten her comfortable enough to drive on public roads yet, but she will soon (just recently got her into the track toy, so we're making baby steps).

35
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 06, 2015, 11:08:44 PM »
A few more pictures. First one when I brought her home. Second from Heather's first drive at the farm. Third is happy wife, happy life. Then some before and after cleaning. I tend to be a little OCD on cleaning things at times, even an off road toy.

36
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 04, 2015, 06:48:59 AM »
Thanks guys. The whole truck is very clean inside and out. I grab more pics when I pick it up Friday or Saturday.  We have 3 daughters (2, 4, and 6) that are going to love it. I cat wait to see the looks on their faces.

37
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 03, 2015, 08:47:18 PM »
I wondered if that might be an issue. I'll get more pictures Friday when I pick it up.

38
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 03, 2015, 08:13:21 PM »
Sent.  Pardon the photo bomb.

My thought, after working in sales and finance for years, is that dealers typically won't put on more money than they can get out of a vehicle. Especially something out of their comfort zone. I feel fairly comfortable matching their $7,500 offer and keeping it in the family. Just wanted some input from people more educated in these trucks.

39
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 03, 2015, 07:49:51 PM »
Same thing

40
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 03, 2015, 09:21:47 AM »
Desktop is doing the same thing my phone does when trying to upload pics.  I click post and it just goes to a blank page.

41
Build Threads / Re: M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 02, 2015, 05:20:44 PM »
Well it's not letting me upload pics from my phone. I'll try this evening.

42
Build Threads / M923A1 Purchase?
« on: June 02, 2015, 05:03:26 PM »
I'm looking for a bit of guidance on a purchase and I hear this is the place to get it. I need to make sure I'm in the right price range on a truck.

My cousin has a 1986 M923A1 wig 24k miles on it. The truck was completely overhauled in 08 and is tagged accordingly. It's clean as can be inside and out, aside from some light dust from him driving it to and from the house. Mechanically it's perfectly sound, no leaks, everything functions, tires are great, etc. No damage anywhere on the truck that I've seen in the last few years he's owned it. The only thing that's been updated are all the lights are LED. He has a local dealer that is willing to give him $7,500 for it.  I think I'd be ok to buy it at that number but I'd like opinions from those who know these vehicles a bit better.  I'll include some pics below, let me know what you think.

43
Site Rules & Introductions / Greetings from Hebron, KY
« on: June 02, 2015, 04:52:59 PM »
My name is Nick, I was referred here by the man in charge, Big Don.  We've known each other for a number of years from a dealership I used to work in.  These days I'm back at the local speed shop playing race car for a living.

Looking to purchase my first military truck within the next week or so and Don referred me here for guidance.

Pages: [1]
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal