0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Here is some writing on ballistics. I’m primarily interested in terminal ballistics. In the urban jungle the likelihood of rolling out of the truck and engaging a target at 100 yards plus is slim. Really slim. So intended use is as a subsonic threat reducer(eliminator) from within 100 yards. Likely less than 50.Terminal ballistics is strong and mag capacity is nice,https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/5-56-nato-vs-300-blackout-ballistics/When the 5.56 impacts flesh below 2700fps (std 55gn) it just becomes an ice pick and does not do as much damage due to the failure to tumble and fragment. Some of the guys here that have been to the sandbox can probably attest to hadjis not going down from short barreled 5.56 rounds which is why they started evolving to the 62,75,77grn rounds. A 220gn 30 cal projectile is a pretty efficient killer. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Quote from: TexasRedNeck on April 21, 2020, 10:53:30 PMHere is some writing on ballistics. I’m primarily interested in terminal ballistics. In the urban jungle the likelihood of rolling out of the truck and engaging a target at 100 yards plus is slim. Really slim. So intended use is as a subsonic threat reducer(eliminator) from within 100 yards. Likely less than 50.Terminal ballistics is strong and mag capacity is nice,https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/5-56-nato-vs-300-blackout-ballistics/When the 5.56 impacts flesh below 2700fps (std 55gn) it just becomes an ice pick and does not do as much damage due to the failure to tumble and fragment. Some of the guys here that have been to the sandbox can probably attest to hadjis not going down from short barreled 5.56 rounds which is why they started evolving to the 62,75,77grn rounds. A 220gn 30 cal projectile is a pretty efficient killer. Sent from my iPad using TapatalkSeveral comments:a 123 grain .30 cal bullet is a darned good people killer (Unfortunately)Some of you may recall the story I shared from a SF buddy who shot a bad person twice, then twice again, then twice more over a couple minutes to finally get the job done. All shots impacted in the chest/upper abdomen area.My .300 with a 10" barrel seems to be a bunch more powerful than my 5.56'sBeing able to use all my AR mags for whichever gun(s) and things like bolt inchangerability make having the .300 good.Having a good running .300 eliminates the need to stock an AK, unless you plan on being invaded by mexican cartel types or the Chinese Army.
Although sitting here in the dark makes me wonder if I should spend the $ on a thermal night vision
Yeah the pvs14 I have is good but goggles with an ir laser would be better. Who needs a sight picture when you just follow the line to the target. I really like thermal for detection, especially in the brush or moonless nights. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Night vision is the cornerstone to winnin' a gunfight that happens at night in my humble opinion.But assumin' its people you're fightin'Downside is if the folks you're in gun play with also have nods.
So, Bobby...being the calculating trained warrior NCO that you are. Take the appropriate action, Execute!
your standard grunt level CQB is just putting rounds and rounds on scary stuff till it stops scaring you!
I want one, I keep thinking about it. I have friends who own 300Blk and they all love it, but only one reloads. Maybe I'll have to pick their brains more and see if they'll let me spend shoot theirs a little more to decide.
Bobbee, I like mine. I like the bigger boom, but that's from the shorter barrel. I like how it pushes back, more like an AK than an AR. But when I'm shootin' at frogs in the mud, the crater that 150 grain makes compared to my green tip 5.56 sez it all.Plus, I remember what those third an inch bullets did to the aluminum of those Bell, Sikorsky, McDonnell-Douglas, Boeing, and Aerospatiale helicapeters that got hit. Really a load of energy in that bullet. Wonder what deers think when they get plowed over by 1?
I still want but haven’t the cash flow. To many other project takin my $ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10.7"